Welcome > Support > Reference Treatises  
 
 
E
 
Read
Writer Panagene     (Date : 2016-07-13 09:15:19)
Subject [Scientific publications] [2013]Comparison of Direct Sequencing, PNA Clamping-Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction, and Pyrosequencing Methods for the Detection of EGFR Mutations in Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma and the Correlation with Clinical Responses to EGFR Tyrosine Kinase In
Content

Korean J Pathol. 2013 Feb;47(1):52-60. doi: 10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2013.47.1.52. Epub 2013 Feb 25.

Comparison of Direct Sequencing, PNA Clamping-Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction, and Pyrosequencing Methods for the Detection of EGFR Mutations in Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma and the Correlation with Clinical Responses to EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Treatment.

Lee HJ1Xu XKim HJin YSun PKim JEChung JH.

Author information

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The aims of this study were to evaluate the abilities of direct sequencing (DS), peptide nucleic acid (PNA) clamping, and pyrosequencing methods to detect epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) samples and to correlate EGFR mutational status as determined by each method with the clinical response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

METHODS:

Sixty-one NSCLC patients treated with EGFR TKIs were identified to investigate somatic mutations in the EGFR gene (exons 18-21).

RESULTS:

Mutations in the EGFR gene were detected in 38 of the 61 patients (62%) by DS, 35 (57%) by PNA clamping and 37 (61%) by pyrosequencing. A total of 44 mutations (72%) were found by at least one of the three methods, and the concordances among the results were relatively high (82-85%; kappa coefficient, 0.713 to 0.736). There were 15 discordant cases (25%) among the three different methods.

CONCLUSIONS:

All three EGFR mutation tests had good concordance rates (over 82%) for FFPE samples. These results suggest that if the DNA quality and enrichment of tumor cells are assured, then DS, PNA clamping, and pyrosequencing are appropriate methods for the detection of EGFR mutations.




 

 No   Subject Writer File Count
   47           [Scientific publications] [2016]Comparison of EGFR .. Panagene 54600
   46           [Scientific publications] [2015]IDH Mutation Analys.. Panagene 32433
   45           [Scientific publications] [2015]Low frequency of KR.. Panagene 46144
   44           [Scientific publications] [2015]Simultaneous genoty.. Panagene 25466
   43           [Scientific publications] [2014]Simultaneous diagno.. Panagene 32139
   42           [Scientific publications] [2014]KRAS Mutation Detec.. Panagene 32914
   41           [Scientific publications] [2013]Detection of EGFR m.. Panagene 23817
   40           [Scientific publications] [2013]Detection and compa.. Panagene 24775
   39           [Scientific publications] [2013]Detection of BRAF V.. Panagene 28270
¢º           [Scientific publications] [2013]Comparison of Direc.. Panagene 28274
   37           [Scientific publications] [PNAClamp]Detection of EG.. Panagene 31354
   36           [Scientific publications] [Clamp]Rapid and Sensitiv.. panagene 24007
   35           [Scientific publications] [PNA microarray] Developm.. Panagene 23859
   34           [Scientific publications] [PANArray¢â] JHDM3A module.. Panagene 28056
   33           [Scientific publications] [PNA Chip vs DNA Chip cli.. Panagene 23852
   32           [Scientific publications] [Panagene publication] PN.. Panagene 23868
   31           [Scientific publications] [Panagene publication] PN.. panagene 29070
   30           [Scientific publications] [Panagene publication] Pe.. panagene 28951
   29           [Scientific publications] [Panagene publication] Hi.. panagene 32861
   28           [Scientific publications] [PNA]Membrane-based hybri.. Panagene 28672
 

< 1 2 3 >