Welcome > Support > Âü°íÀÚ·á  
 
 
E
 
±Ûº¸±â
¼º¸í ÆÄ³ªÁø     (Date : 2016-07-13 10:21:03)
Á¦¸ñ [³í¹®] [2014]Simultaneous diagnostic platform of genotyping EGFR, KRAS, and ALK in 510 Korean patients with non-small-cell lung cancer highlights significantly higher ALK rearrangement rate in advanced stage.
³»¿ë


J Surg Oncol. 2014 Sep;110(3):245-51. doi: 10.1002/jso.23646. Epub 2014 May 29.

Simultaneous diagnostic platform of genotyping EGFR, KRAS, and ALK in 510 Korean patients with non-small-cell lung cancer highlights significantly higher ALK rearrangement rate in advanced stage.

Kim TJ1Park CKYeo CDPark KRhee CKKim JKim SJLee SHLee KYYoon HK.

Author information

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Simultaneous genotyping has advantages in turnaround time and detecting the real mutational prevalence in unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a group not previously genetically characterized.

METHODS:

We developed simultaneous panel of screening EGFR and KRAS mutations by direct sequencing or PNA clamping, and ALK rearrangement by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) in multicenter manner.

RESULTS:

Of 510 NSCLC Korean patients, simultaneous genotyping identified mutations of EGFR (29.0%) and KRAS (8.6%) and rearrangement of ALK (9.2%). Seven patients had overlaps in mutations. Although several well-known associations between genotypes and clinical characteristics were identified, we found no relationship between ALK rearrangement and sex or smoking history. Unlike the other genotype mutations, ALK rearrangement was associated with advanced disease. Among the ALK-negative group, patients with 10-15% of ALK FISH split shared characteristics, such as younger age and advanced stage disease, more with the ALK-positive group (>15% ALK FISH split) than <10% ALK FISH split group.

CONCLUSIONS:

Simultaneous panel genotyping revealed more prevalent ALK rearrangements than reported in previous studies and their strong association with advanced stage irrespective of sex or smoking history. ALK rearrangement seems to be a marker for aggressive tumor biology and should be assessed in advanced disease.

© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


 

 ¹øÈ£   Á¦¸ñ ÀÛ¼ºÀÚ ÆÄÀÏ Á¶È¸
   49           [³í¹®] [2016]Comparison of EGFR .. ÆÄ³ªÁø 30627
   48           [³í¹®] [2015]IDH Mutation Analys.. ÆÄ³ªÁø 65535
   47           [³í¹®] [2015]Low frequency of KR.. ÆÄ³ªÁø 41433
   46           [³í¹®] [2015]Simultaneous genoty.. ÆÄ³ªÁø 6448
¢º           [³í¹®] [2014]Simultaneous diagno.. ÆÄ³ªÁø 25262
   44           [³í¹®] [2014]KRAS Mutation Detec.. ÆÄ³ªÁø 11211
   43           [³í¹®] [2013]Detection of EGFR m.. ÆÄ³ªÁø 1448
   42           [³í¹®] [2013]Detection and compa.. ÆÄ³ªÁø 6080
   41           [³í¹®] [2013]Detection of BRAF V.. ÆÄ³ªÁø 6432
   40           [³í¹®] [2013]Comparison of Direc.. ÆÄ³ªÁø 29521
   39           [³í¹®] [Microarray]Peptide nucle.. ÆÄ³ªÁø 17184
   38           [³í¹®] [Clamp]Rapid and Sensitiv.. ÆÄ³ªÁø 35177
   37           [³í¹®] [ÆÄ³ªÁø Á¦Ç°»ç¿ë ³í¹®] EGFR µ¹¿¬º¯.. ÆÄ³ªÁø 3704
   36           [³í¹®] [ÆÄ³ªÁø Á¦Ç°»ç¿ë ³í¹®] Development .. ÆÄ³ªÁø 17372
   35           [³í¹®] [ÆÄ³ªÁø Á¦Ç°»ç¿ë ³í¹®] JHDM3A modul.. ÆÄ³ªÁø 1492
   34           [³í¹®] [PNA Chip vs DNA Chip ÀÓ»ó.. ÆÄ³ªÁø 8979
   33           [³í¹®] [ÆÄ³ªÁø ³í¹®¹ßÇ¥] PNA-mediated Re.. ÆÄ³ªÁø 14818
   32           [³í¹®] [ÆÄ³ªÁø Á¦Ç°»ç¿ë ³í¹®] ºñ¼Ò¼¼Æ÷Æó¾Ï¿¡.. ÆÄ³ªÁø 18470
   31           [³í¹®] [ÆÄ³ªÁø ³í¹® ¹ßÇ¥] PNA-Based Anti.. ÆÄ³ªÁø 3989
   30           [³í¹®] [ÆÄ³ªÁø ³í¹®¹ßÇ¥]Peptide nucleic .. ÆÄ³ªÁø 4239
 

< 1 2 3 >